Radar vs. Ultrasonic – which is right for you? Envirotech Online

2022-07-02 07:06:01 By : Ms. Samantha Huang

Don’t guess! Measure! Many parameters. One MQuant® StripScan app.

Are Micropollutants on the Rise?

Modbus RTU enhances communication in sample conditioning systems

New PID sensor takes VOC monitoring to the next level

New service for monitoring of environmental risks on Brownfield sites

Hazardous Materials: Spills and Soil Contamination – an ION Science we...

Chem Service, Inc., acquired by AnalytiChem to expand CRM and pesticide...

Firstly, the technology is a well-proven, well understood measurement technique and is consistently and routinely used throughout industries all over the globe. You can rely on ultrasonic measurement to give you accurate and reliable readings every time, aside from its consistency, there are a huge number of standard control routines providing you with an outstanding level of control.

Today’s businesses are constantly being reminded to reduce their power consumption and have their carbon footprint at the forefront of their minds. There are low power, loop or battery powered operating ultrasonic systems that have been developed to provide a solution to just that. These systems provide ideal answers to the issues of monitoring levels in remote locations and reducing power consumption on site. Advances in power management technology mean that the battery life of these systems is measured in years.

Plain and simple, a non-contacting system does an upstanding job, deriving distance by firing a signal and listening for the return echo. But now, with millions of pounds of research and development, tens of thousands of installations and a huge advancement in technology, ultrasonic measurement remains the foundation stone of process control and measurement.

Non-contacting radar technology comes in two different types, pulsed and Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW). Both technologies work by emitting radio frequency energy and measuring the time it takes for a signal to return from a target with a significantly higher dielectric constant than air.

The key difference between the two types of radar measurement is that pulsed radar emits a series of radio frequency pulses and measures the time it takes for the signal to return from the target to the emitter. A challenge when at the speed of light, the signal will return in a fraction of a microsecond. Whereas FMCW measure time of flight, but transmits continuously, constantly varying the frequency of the signal. The frequency of the returning signal is compared to the signal being emitted at that moment using a mathematical technique called Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The difference between the two corresponding to the time the signal has taken to return. FMCW is said to be the more accurate of the two because of its narrower bean angle and in most cases a stronger signal.

There really is no difference in control and measurement functionality with radar and ultrasonic measurement. The only major factor in determining which technology to use is the measurement type. You can probably start off by assuming that ultrasonic measurement will solve your problem. Even in the cluttered busy wet wells we see in everyday sewage treatment applications.

Radar echo strength is also related to the dielectric constant of the reflecting object. If you are measuring something with a low dielectric constant and there are obstructions with a high dielectric constant, there will be some serious measurement problems. Ultrasonic is only concerned with the surface texture of the object for its ability to reflect sound, rather than what the object is made from.

Sometimes termed as emerging micropollutants or contaminants of emerging concern,  micropollutants have been an increasingly hot potato in scientific and po...

For studies of nitrate movement through catchments and aquifers to provide meaningful information, they need to accurately capture the impact of local condit...

Micropollutants – defined as substances which can infiltrate our environment at low concentrations and bioaccumulate over time, thus contaminating it – h...

Spain’s Murcia region achieves world-leading rates for wastewater recycling. For the past nine months, Aquamonitrix® has been used to monitor nitrate and...

In This Edition ICMGP Preview - ICMGP 2022 mercury conference will be ‘virtual’ - Mercury – a persistent challenge Water / Wastewater - AI supports flow measurements - Emerging...

International Labmate Limited Oak Court Business Centre Sandridge Park, Porters Wood St Albans Hertfordshire AL3 6PH United Kingdom

T +44 (0)1727 858 840 F +44 (0)1727 840 310 E info@labmate-online.com

Copyright © 2022 Labmate Online. All rights reserved.